Gun Control Persuasive Paper Essay Example for Free

Gun Control Persuasive Paper EssayA hoagy hold in law is any law that restricts the use, purchase, or possession of any firearms (Conservapedia). These laws ar implemented to slenderise the use of firearms to authorized members of a states government. Each state in America has its aver laws regarding gun control however, among all, California has the plasteredest laws, scoring 81 out of a 100 (OMara). Gun control laws are necessary in a state because they decrease violence, increase governments bulwark in the state, and decrease the lethalness of other crimes. Gun control laws set up reduce violence and crime. In the coupled States, 67% of crimes in 2010 were committed with firearms (Rogers, 2007). This means that majority of crimes committed in America had guns and other firearms involved. If firearms are prohibited in the state, then in theory, crime rates will go dget by 67%. Guns have the ability to take someones life. Having that said, disallowing the use of guns ca n non solely decrease crime rates, but lower causalities as well.Ozanne-Smith et al (2004) arrived at a similar remnant in a study conducted in Victoria, Australia after examining the trend in the firearm-related deaths in the context of strong legislative reform. They found the followingSignificant and dramatic declines in rates of firearm related deaths occurred in Victoria and Australia after periods of strong legislative reform. Statistically significant reductions in firearm related suicides were ascertained after legislative reforms. In 2000, rates of firearm related deaths were less than two per 100 000 cosmos for Victoria and Australia compared with 10.4 per 100 000 population for the United States. In Victoria, reductions in the numbers of registered firearms of 25% and of licensed shooters of 15% were seen over the four years between 199798 and 200001 (Ozanne-Smith, 2004).Prohibiting civilians from using guns can increase the effectiveness of the law of nature in ones state. When a person owns a gun, in theory he can protect himself and therefore does not need protection from the police. Thus, he becomes independent. However, if a person is not allowed to own a gun, he becomes to a greater extent dependent upon the government for his safety and the police and the government now becomes more aware of the importance of their task in protecting their state.Lastly, the restriction of firearms can decrease the lethalness of crimes other than take and homicide. Often times, minor criminals like thieves and robbers commit their crimes with a firearm, when in reality the commission of their crime does not require it. They simply use the guns for self-defense. As a result, they are more likely to kill their victims kinda than just stealing from them. Therefore, they not only steal, but they kill as well. The prohibition of firearms can diminish a criminals ability from committing another crime by decreasing the probability of hit and homicide.However, firearms have its benefits as well. But if the aforementioned is not used in the right way, it will cash in ones chips to serious consequences including death. Thats why gun control laws are implied in a state to vex and prevent the misuse of such firearms.